|  | <<  
             ^ 
              >> 
            
              | Date: 1999-11-09 
 
 Chip-ID auch von AMD und National-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 
 Nach Intel, dessen Pentium III Identifikationsnummer Wirbel
 ausgelöst hat, überlegen auch AMD und National Senmiconductor
 Identififkationsnummern in die Hardware einzubauen
 
 http://archiv.quintessenz.at/archiv/msg00551.html
 http://archiv.quintessenz.at/archiv/msg00550.html
 http://archiv.quintessenz.at/archiv/msg00476.html
 http://archiv.quintessenz.at/archiv/msg00471.html
 http://archiv.quintessenz.at/archiv/msg00467.html
 
 -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 Do you want your microprocessor talking about you behind your
 back? The trend toward user ID technologies built into
 microprocessors--designed to provide a numerical ID when, say, you
 make an electronic transaction on the Web--is accelerating. Privacy
 groups are up in arms.
 
 Intel recently got into hot water with several privacy groups because
 of the Pentium III's unique processor identification numbers and
 random number generators, which are used to track and validate
 electronic commerce transactions. The numbers help identify the
 owner of a chip to a Web site when a transaction is to take place.
 The ID is a 64-bit number within the chip's wiring; it's designed to
 create a 96-bit unique serial number, accessible by software, to
 identify the user.
 
 Intel has also produced a software utility designed to let users erase
 their ID numbers, but that wasn't enough for some privacy groups,
 including the Electronic Privacy Information Center and the American
 Civil Liberties Union. Responding to protests, Intel scaled back its
 effort and decided to make use of the IDs voluntary. The Pentium III
 will ship with the feature disabled, enabling customers to turn it on if
 they want. The topic was a hot one at the recent RSA Data Security
 Conference. The ability to build security features into
 microprocessors may be a big benefit to corporations and the
 software industry, which could use the IDs to police the illegal
 copying of software.
 
 Security!
 
 Intel has made security into a battle cry recently, and many other
 security features are likely to be incorporated into Intel chips,
 possibly drawing the ire of privacy groups.
 
 Intel isn't alone in bringing security and microprocessors together.
 Both Advanced Micro Devices and National Semiconductor are
 evaluating chip security technology as well. And privacy groups are
 expecting conflicts similar to the one that arose with Intel over
 electronic ID technologies, such as concerns about digital
 signatures.
 
 Washington is waking up to the issue of privacy as it relates to
 microprocessors and beyond. When Congress convened at the
 beginning of this month, dozens of high-tech privacy bills were
 discussed, several of which are expected to take shape this year.
 Some of the bills take on issues such as electronic commerce
 privacy, encryption, and legal liability resulting from year 2000
 problems. Several privacy groups, including the Center for
 Democracy and Technology, are working with legislators on the
 upcoming bills.
 
 Source
 http://www.individual.com/frames/story.shtml?story=c1105202.7zf&level3=621&date=19991108
 -.-  -.-. --.-
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 edited by Harkank
 published on: 1999-11-09
 comments to office@quintessenz.at
 subscribe Newsletter
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 <<  
                   ^ 
                    >>
 |  |  |  |